Airtel has misrepresented records & facts, accuses Jio

Share:
Reliance Jio has accused Bharti Airtel of mispresenting data and wrongly deciphering the newcomer’s information on purpose, to ‘create a smoke-display screen to hide its unwell-gotten profits’ underneath the prevailing interconnect utilization price (IUC) regime, the modern day example of a warfare of words between the 2 bitter rivals who are involved in a brutal price conflict.

Mukesh Ambani-owned Jio has requested the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) to do so towards the No.1 telco owned via Sunil Mittal for making fake representations against Jio’s evaluation on Airtel’s alleged excess IUC recuperation in the past 5 years, and influencing the continued session technique on the rate in its favour.

Jio turned into rebutting Airtel’s September 6 letter to Trai, where the market leader had accused the new entrant of misleading the regulator via its claims that India’s top 3 telcos had benefited by means of almost Rs 1 lakh crore in the final five years from IUC no longer being lowered. Airtel stated it had in fact made Rs 6,800-crore loss because of IUC not protecting its fee. Jio desires the contentious IUC — the 14 paise a minute price that a mobile provider company will pay another to hyperlink a call to the latter’s community — to be scraped at the same time as older operators inclusive of Airtel, Vodafone and idea Celular want it to be doubled to cover their value of carriage. Trai is inside the process of figuring out what the rate have to be.




“at the outset, it's miles submitted that Airtel’s contentions are misplaced and devoid of any fact and common sense,” Jio said in a letter to Trai dated 11th of September. “it is obvious that this misrepresentation of information and wrong interpretation of records has been performed purposefully to create a smokescreen to hide its unwell-gotten income and to aid its false pretense of loss beneath the existing IUC regime.”

Jio had alleged gains of Rs forty six,958 crore made by Airtel, and Rs 1 lakh crore made cumulatively by using the 3 incumbents, due to the IUC now not being lowered in keeping with Reliance Jio has accused Bharti Airtel of mispresenting records and wrongly deciphering the newcomer’s records on reason, to ‘create a smoke-display to hide its unwell-gotten earnings’ beneath the existing interconnect usage price (IUC) regime, the present day example of a conflict of words among the 2 sour opponents who're worried in a brutal fee struggle.



Mukesh Ambani-owned Jio has asked the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) to take action in opposition to the No.1 telco owned by using Sunil Mittal for making false representations in opposition to Jio’s evaluation on Airtel’s alleged excess IUC recovery within the beyond 5 years, and influencing the continuing session technique on the fee in its favour.

Jio turned into rebutting Airtel’s September 6 letter to Trai, in which the market leader had accused the brand new entrant of misleading the regulator through its claims that India’s pinnacle 3 telcos had benefited with the aid of nearly Rs 1 lakh crore within the closing five years from IUC no longer being diminished. Airtel stated it had in reality made Rs 6,800-crore loss due to IUC no longer protecting its fee. Jio needs the contentious IUC — the 14 paise a minute fee that a cell service issuer will pay every other to hyperlink a name to the latter’s network — to be scraped while older operators together with Airtel, Vodafone and concept Celular want it to be doubled to cover their cost of carriage. Trai is inside the procedure of figuring out what the fee must be.


“on the outset, it's far submitted that Airtel’s contentions are out of place and devoid of any reality and logic,” Jio said in a letter to Trai dated 9-11. “it's miles apparent that this misrepresentation of records and wrong interpretation of information has been carried out purposefully to create a smokescreen to cover its sick-gotten earnings and to aid its fake pretense of loss beneath the present IUC regime.”

Jio had alleged profits of Rs 46,958 crore made via Airtel, and Rs 1 lakh crore made cumulatively with the aid of the three incumbents, because of the IUC now not being lowered in keeping with Trai’s representation to the supreme courtroom in 2011, in an analysis supplied at a regulator’s workshop on July 18. Jio stated that Trai had determined to lower IUC of 10 paise a minute in 2012 to bill and maintain (BAK) regime from 2014 wherein the fee is 0.

On Monday, Jio termed Airtel’s claims in its September 6 letter as ‘grossly incorrect and improper’, on the grounds that Airtel’s fee of 30 paise according to minute on the completely allotted fee (FAC) technique, inclusive of capex, became in no way common by Trai, and have to now not be taken into consideration as it became artificial and inflated.




“it's miles glaring that maximum of the tariff plans of a dominant operator i.e. Airtel, are predatory and in blatant and contumacious contravention of the provisions contained in the Telecommunications Tariff Order, 1999 (“TTO”),” Jio stated inside the letter to Trai chairman RS Sharma, searching for motion against Airtel. ET has seen a copy of the letter.

Jio stands to lose if IUC is raised, as it might need to pay greater to incumbents, even as incumbents stand to lose vastly if the rate is scrapped, as they would lose a supply of net revenue.

the brand new carrier said that Airtel intentionally neglected its pay-out closer to IUC that it recovered from customers — obvious from tariffs for off-internet calls being at top rate to on-internet calls — which comes to a complete of Rs 24,750 crore.

An Airtel authentic stated that Jio’s present argument changed into misleading. “The calculation for charge of IUC need to remember the distinction between off-net incoming and off-internet outgoing calls. We’re amused to look the on-net calls also being considered with the aid of Jio of their calculations. Which operator pays IUC for on-internet calls?”

In its remaining week’s verbal exchange to Trai, Airtel had said that its actual receipts were Rs 7,795 crore, a long way decrease than Jio’s claims, and that it became in truth making losses. The Sunil Mittal-owned telco accused Jio of trying to distort records to reveal other operators in a terrible mild. “We post that the price of work accomplished through Airtel in terminating a name is agnostic to the originating operator… consequently it's far most effective appropriate that the restoration be calculated on all incoming site visitors handled by using Airtel,” Jio argued, asking Trai to dismiss Airtel’s rivalry. had determined to decrease IUC of 10 paise a minute in 2012 to bill and maintain (BAK) regime from 2014 wherein the charge is zero.

On Monday, Jio termed Airtel’s claims in its September 6 letter as ‘grossly incorrect and improper’, when you consider that Airtel’s price of 30 paise according to minute at the completely allocated price (FAC) method, inclusive of capex, became never accepted by using Trai, and should no longer be considered because it turned into synthetic and inflated.




“it is evident that maximum of the tariff plans of a dominant operator i.e. Airtel, are predatory and in blatant and contumacious contravention of the provisions contained in the Telecommunications Tariff Order, 1999 (“TTO”),” Jio said in the letter to Trai chairman RS Sharma, seeking movement in opposition to Airtel. ET has visible a copy of the letter.

Jio stands to lose if IUC is raised, as it'd should pay more to incumbents, whilst incumbents stand to lose massively if the price is scrapped, as they might lose a supply of net revenue.

the brand new service said that Airtel intentionally ignored its pay-out towards IUC that it recovered from clients — glaring from tariffs for off-net calls being at top class to on-internet calls — which involves a total of Rs 24,750 crore.

An Airtel authentic said that Jio’s gift argument become deceptive. “The calculation for price of IUC should take into account the difference between off-net incoming and off-net outgoing calls. We’re amused to peer the on-net calls also being taken into consideration with the aid of Jio in their calculations. Which operator pays IUC for on-net calls?”

In its closing week’s conversation to Trai, Airtel had stated that its real receipts have been Rs 7,795 crore, a long way lower than Jio’s claims, and that it became in reality making losses. The Sunil Mittal-owned telco accused Jio of attempting to distort information to show other operators in a bad light. “We post that the value of labor completed with the aid of Airtel in terminating a name is agnostic to the originating operator… therefore it is simplest suitable that the restoration be calculated on all incoming visitors treated through Airtel,” Jio argued, asking Trai to push aside Airtel’s rivalry.

No comments